Skip to content

Loans

Secured vs. unsecured personal loans

Collateral changes the risk, the rate and the approval odds on a personal loan. Here is how to weigh the trade-off.

Published Β· Last updated

Advertising disclosure: MoneyLoanHub may receive compensation when you click certain links or complete an action with a partner. This does not change the cost of the product to you. Compensation may influence where providers appear on the page. Read the full disclosure.

The core difference

An unsecured personal loan is backed only by the borrower's promise to repay and their credit profile. A secured personal loan is backed by an asset β€” such as a savings account, certificate of deposit, or vehicle title β€” that the lender can claim if the loan is not repaid.

Because collateral reduces the lender's risk, secured loans are sometimes available at lower rates or to borrowers who would not qualify for an unsecured loan on credit history alone. The trade-off is that a default can mean losing the pledged asset, not just credit-score damage.

Who tends to use each

Borrowers with strong, established credit often have no need to pledge collateral and can access unsecured loans at competitive rates. Borrowers with thin or damaged credit files sometimes use a secured loan, or a secured credit-builder product, specifically because it widens the pool of lenders willing to approve them.

Some lenders offer both structures on the same underlying product, adjusting the rate offered based on whether collateral is pledged. It is reasonable to ask a lender whether pledging an asset would materially change the rate or approval decision before assuming it is necessary.

Risk considerations

The central risk of a secured loan is losing the asset, and in some cases owing a remaining balance if the asset's liquidation value is less than what is owed. Read the agreement for exactly what triggers repossession or seizure and how much notice, if any, is given.

The central risk of an unsecured loan is typically a higher rate reflecting the lender's greater exposure, plus more reliance on credit history and income verification during underwriting.

When credit history is a limiting factor

Borrowers who do not qualify for standard unsecured products sometimes turn to lenders that specialize in weaker credit files. These often carry higher rates to offset default risk, whether or not collateral is involved, so the total cost β€” not just approval odds β€” should be part of the comparison.

Building or rebuilding credit history through on-time payments on any loan type, secured or not, generally improves future access to lower-cost unsecured credit.

Sources and further reading

Where a figure or rule is cited, the issuing body's own publication is authoritative and may have changed since our last review.

How this page was produced

Written by
MoneyLoanHub Editorial Team
Accuracy review
MoneyLoanHub Review Desk

Content is researched from regulator and provider documentation, written to be neutral, and re-checked when rules or product terms change. Read our editorial policy.

Related guides

MoneyLoanHub publishes general information for research and education. It is not financial, legal or tax advice and it does not account for your personal circumstances. MoneyLoanHub is not a lender and does not make credit decisions. We provide educational information and may refer visitors to third-party providers. Terms, eligibility and availability are set by each provider. Always confirm rates, fees and eligibility directly with the provider before applying. Full disclaimer.